Showing posts with label review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label review. Show all posts

Friday, July 29, 2011

KM practice: from the corporate world to Hcare

I have been working for a decade to help translate KM experience and know-how from the business sector to health care. Being self-employed, I never had the bandwidth or resources to do what you have done. This lit review should help enable thoughful evidence-based discussions of how we can best crosswalk lessons from business into healthcare to apply KM methods to patient safety.

Kothari A, Hovanec N, Hastie R, Sibbald S. Lessons from the Business Sector for Successful Knowledge Management in Health Care: A Systematic Review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Jul 25;11(1):173. [Epub ahead of print]
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21787403

Many thanks to the authors for their work.

Friday, February 27, 2009

high reliablity in literature search work

This issue has been of interest to me for a while.

Sampson M, McGowan J, Cogo E, Grimshaw J, Moher D, Lefebvre C.
An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Feb 18. [Epub ahead of print]

The notion of the reliability of the evidence identification process has been of keen interest ever since the Hopkins IRB incident where a good intentioned researcher missed important information that was a part of the failure spiral that resulted in the death of a healthy research volunteer.

This article discussed the use of peer review and checklists (used to improve reliability in other facets of medical work) as a potential improvement mechanism for the evidence retrieval process. I hope by the time I get through the article, others have too - and we can chat about it here.

I hope Sampson and colleagues provide us all with backgound that will lend support to some failure analysis work in this area. I've been talking that up and pitching it for years --- perhaps a door will open now for the study this gap requires to fully understand it.